Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Mortgage crisis cuts both ways Aventura Homes

South Florida Real Estate Information

MIAMI – Oct. 1, 2008 – She was only 21 when she decided to become a mortgage broker. A newlywed, Michelle LaPiana felt that her own broker had misled her and her husband during the daunting purchase of their first home in Hialeah.

She claims she fell prey to a bait and switch. The closing costs were nearly double what the couple previously had been told. By the time they sat with a title agent to sign the loan documents, it was too late to walk away without losing thousands of dollars.

“The closing costs were $9,680,” recalled LaPiana, now 38 and divorced. “I remember everything. I even remember my closing agent’s name.”

The incident angered her but also motivated her to help other people navigate the potentially treacherous process. A graduate of Hialeah-Miami Lakes High, she skipped college, got her license and launched what was a rewarding and successful career in mortgage lending.

Now, 17 years later, the former president of the Miami chapter of the Florida Association of Mortgage Brokers and once-ambitious subprime account executive finds herself broke and in foreclosure.

The single mother of two insists her story is not one of the recklessness, greed or fraud that has plagued the mortgage business and sparked the credit crisis on Wall Street.

Instead, she says, she is part of the damage left behind by an investment frenzy and a wave of opportunists who hijacked her profession and ran it in into the ground in just a few short years.

“I feel I was a victim, but I feel government is not going to help people like me,” LaPiana said.

LaPiana says she cannot find work in South Florida because of a new stigma attached to having worked in the world of subprime lending. Reports of felons having flooded the business during the boom years have not helped.

“They look at me as if ‘because of her this is why the economy is the way it is,’” LaPiana said.

The stigma may be worse in South Florida – often described as ground zero for subprime loans, or high-cost loans extended to borrowers with poor credit. Mortgages requiring no proof of income or assets were also widely sold. The high default rate among these loans is blamed for sparking the credit crunch that began a little over a year ago. Lenders began restricting access to credit to prevent future losses, leading to an economic slowdown.

But LaPiana says her role was less direct because she never sold a home to a borrower who couldn’t afford it.

Brian Kettenring, a head organizer with Florida ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, a national grass-roots community activist organization, agreed that many real estate professionals are being unfairly painted with the same brush.

“There was a fair amount of predatory lending by brokers and lenders, but there are a lot of good people who work in the industry and too many of them are being hurt in the destruction of the industry as a whole,” Kettenring said.

Wave of failures

The ripple effects of the credit crunch hit an apex in recent weeks with the failure of the venerable investment bank Lehman Brothers; the near-collapse of American International Group, the world’s largest insurance company, and Washington Mutual’s seizure by federal regulators and subsequent sale in the biggest bank failures in U.S. history.

LaPiana said nobody foresaw the impending catastrophe from their respective corners. She views herself as among the tiniest of conduits in the vast matrix of players wheeling and dealing in the era of cheap money that made the housing boom possible.

After more than a decade of selling traditional mortgages, LaPiana was swept up in the excitement of new, innovative loans that made homeownership possible for millions of Americans.

In 2001, she joined Fieldstone Mortgage’s subprime division as a wholesale account executive. She would hold the same position at a string of other wholesalers over the next six years, specializing in high-cost and highly profitably subprime mortgages.

Wholesale lenders deal with mortgage companies and brokers who make their cash available to home buyers by immediately funding their loans. They do not deal with borrowers. Once the loans are brokered, the wholesalers, typically thinly capitalized companies, sell the debt to commercial banks, other lenders or investment houses, like former brokerage Bear Stearns.

“Subprime loans were the hot commodity of Wall Street. That’s all everybody wanted,” LaPiana said.

As an account executive, her job was visiting brokers and selling the loan programs offered by her company. Wholesalers generally compensate account executives based on the volume of business they bring to the company. For each million dollars LaPiana sold, she earned a half percentage point, or $5,000. In the peak years of the boom, she says she did an average of five deals a day. Sometimes, her biweekly paychecks topped $20,000.

“I still have the pay stubs,” LaPiana said ruefully, adding she couldn’t toss them because she hopes to once again earn such a handsome income.

The high life

With her new wealth, LaPiana traveled – skiing in Colorado and visiting New York City. She bought a top-of-the-line Jeep Commander and, after her divorce, a “dream home” in Kendall where she would live comfortably with her two girls and mother.

“I didn’t go overboard,” LaPiana insisted, “I didn’t buy the two investment properties, the two condos on the beach, but I should have saved more.”

Even though she was making almost $200,000 a year, her competitors, who sold loans requiring no proof of income or assets, were making more. LaPiana said many of the loans she sold didn’t ask for proof, but did require a borrower to submit evidence that they had filed an income tax return with the IRS as self-employed.

Such loans have been dubbed “liar loans” in the industry because of the high rate of fraud later found in mortgage applications when the homes went into foreclosure.

It was enough to give her competitors an edge. While LaPiana was pounding the pavements making sales to mortgage companies, many of her competitors were able to do most of their business by phone from their homes, she said.

The subprime lenders they worked for were also among the first to bite the dust when borrowers began defaulting in droves in 2007, she said. Soon LaPiana was jumping from job to job as four successive employers declared bankruptcy or closed their subprime divisions between 2006 and 2007.

Peter Ticktin, a Deerfield Beach lawyer who practices foreclosure defense, said the self-deluded industry imploded because it believed property values would continue rising, eliminating the risk of losses. “What was going on was a systematic Ponzi scheme,” Ticktin said. “It wasn’t where you had one main character organizing it. It wasn’t a conspiracy.”

The final insult

LaPiana’s last position was with the CIT Group, based in New York, which told its account executives last September they were out of a job.

“That one really hurt because it was like, ‘Where do you go from here?’ I realized there was a major problem. It all went rolling down,” she said.

Almost as fast as the subprime industry itself, LaPiana’s life went into a tailspin. She went from making great money to collecting unemployment. Her savings were eaten up by an expensive adjustable-rate loan, a car payment and the cost of supporting a family of four.

Her problems mounted as she struggled to find a job. In July, she woke up one morning and found her Jeep Commander missing from the driveway. It had been repossessed. “I knew it was going to happen,” she said. LaPiana made her last mortgage payment in May. The lenders are hounding her out of her half-million-dollar dream. She’s had to borrow money from friends.

“When your daughters ask you for money to go to the movies and you tell them . . . I can’t. …” LaPiana started to cry. “I have no insurance. I make my daughters drink their vitamins in the morning because they know they can’t get sick. I teach them how not to get sick.”

How does she cope with the stress?

“I smoke and drink a lot of coffee. I don’t sleep,” she said, wiping tears away.

Kettenring, of ACORN, said his organization was accepting applications for foreclosure prevention counselors at their South Florida office, and most were coming from former brokers.

“It’s incredible the number of people who are applying for those positions that have worked in the industry for years,” Kettering said, “We’re seeing the near total collapse of the housing industry including the employment of people who worked in the industry.”

Despite the trials, LaPiana hasn’t given up.

Described by her friends as a self-starter and a fighter, she recently got a license to sell insurance and is trying to build a book of business.

She still stays involved with mortgage lending, keeping up with new regulations. Her brokers license remains valid.

For more information regarding the above web Blog, please call Dean or Bonnie Isenberg at 305-936-2489 / 800-819-5466 or visit them on-line at A-Realtor.Com

Click Here To E-Mail The “I-Team”

Click Here To Request More Information About The Above Web Blog

South Florida Real Estate Information

Miami Real Estate Information

Sell Your Boat On-Line

Thank You !

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Bush team, Congress negotiate $700B bailout

South Florida Real Estate Information

Miami Real Estate Information

Miami – The Bush administration asked Congress on Saturday for the power to buy $700 billion in toxic assets clogging the financial system and threatening the economy as negotiations began on the largest bailout since the Great Depression.

The rescue plan would give Washington broad authority to purchase bad mortgage-related assets from U.S. financial institutions for the next two years. It does not specify which institutions qualify or what, if anything, the government would get in return for the unprecedented infusion.

Democrats are pressing to require that the plan help more strapped borrowers stay in their homes and to condition the bailout on new limits on executive compensation.

Congressional aides and administration officials are working through the weekend to fill in the details of the proposal. The White House hoped for a deal with Congress by the time markets opened Monday; top lawmakers say they would push to enact the plan as early as the coming week.

“We’re going to work with Congress to get a bill done quickly,” President Bush said at the White House. Without discussing specifics, he said, “This is a big package because it was a big problem.”

The proposal is a mere three pages long, but it gives sweeping powers to the government to dispense gigantic sums of taxpayer dollars in a program that would be sheltered from court review.

“It’s a rather brief bill with a lot of money,” said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman. “We understand the importance of the anticipation in the markets, but we also know that what we’re doing is going to have consequences for decades to come. There’s not a second act to this – we’ve got to get this right.”

Lawmakers digesting the eye-popping cost and searching for specifics voiced concerns that the proposal offers no help for struggling homeowners or safeguards for taxpayers’ money.

The government must stabilize the financial system “because if we don’t, it will have a tremendous impact on American consumers, homeowners, taxpayers and the rest,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in San Francisco.

But, she added, “We cannot deal with this unless this bailout helps families stay in their homes.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. said, “We cannot allow ourselves to be in denial about the threat now facing the world economy. From all indications, that threat is real, and the consequences of inaction could be catastrophic. Every single American has a stake in preventing a global financial meltdown.”

The proposal would raise the statutory limit on the national debt from $10.6 trillion to $11.3 trillion to make room for the massive rescue.

“The American people are furious that we’re in this situation, and so am I,” the House’s top Republican, Ohio Rep. John A. Boehner, said in a statement. “We need to do everything possible to protect the taxpayers from the consequences of a broken Washington.”

Signaling what could erupt into a brutal fight with Democrats over add-on spending, Boehner said, “Efforts to exploit this crisis for political leverage or partisan quid pro quo will only delay the economic stability that families, seniors, and small businesses deserve.”

Bush said he worried the financial troubles “could ripple throughout” the economy and affect average citizens. “The risk of doing nothing far outweighs the risk of the package. ... Over time, we’re going to get a lot of the money back.”

He added, “People are beginning to doubt our system, people were losing confidence and I understand it’s important to have confidence in our financial system.”

Neither presidential candidate took a position on the proposal. GOP nominee John McCain said he was awaiting specifics and any changes by Congress.

Democratic rival Barack Obama used the party’s weekly radio address to call for help for Main Street as well as Wall Street.

His language reflected a tricky balance that politicians in both parties are trying to strike, just six weeks before Election Day: Back a plan that doles out hundreds of billions to companies that made bad bets and still identify with the plight of middle-class voters.

Besides mortgage help and executive compensation limits, Democrats are considering attaching middle-class assistance to the legislation despite a request from Bush to avoid adding items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possibility.

Bush sidestepped questions about the chances of adding such items, saying that now was not the time for posturing. “I think most leaders would understand we need to get this done quickly, and you know, the cleaner the better,” he said about legislation being drafted.

Treasury officials met congressional staff for about two hours on Capitol Hill on Saturday. Discussions centered on how the plan would work, and Democrats proposed adding the executive compensation limits and new foreclosure-prevention measures. Details of those changes were not available Saturday. Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson conferred by phone for about 20 minutes in the afternoon, gauging how the negotiations were unfolding.

Among the key issues up for negotiation is which financial institutions would be eligible for the help. The proposed legislation doesn’t make it clear, leaving open the question of whether hedge funds or pension funds could qualify.

In a fact sheet released Saturday night, Treasury said it was seeking latitude for the secretary and the Federal Reserve chairman to expand the bailout to non-U.S. companies if they determined it was necessary to stabilize markets, but the original request sent to Congress is limited to firms headquartered in the United States, according to a copy obtained by The Associated Press.

The proposal does not require that the government receive anything from banks in return for unloading their bad assets. But it would allow Treasury to designate financial institutions as “agents of the government,” and mandate that they perform any “reasonable duties” that might entail.

The government could contract with private companies to manage the assets it purchased under the rescue.

Paulson says the government would in essence set up reverse auctions, putting up money for a class of distressed assets – such as loans that are delinquent but not in default – and financial institutions would compete for how little they would accept.

For more information regarding the above web Blog, please call Dean or Bonnie Isenberg at 305-936-2489 / 800-819-5466 or visit them on-line at A-Realtor.Com

Click Here To E-Mail The “I-Team”

Click Here To Request More Information About The Above Web Blog

South Florida Real Estate Information

Miami Real Estate Information

Sell Your Boat On-Line

Thank You !

Labels: , , , , , , ,